16.2.516 · Inherited Change
Predicting Inheritance- Chi-squared Test — Cambridge AS & A Level Biology 9700 Revision Notes & Topical Questions
5 min read 8 parts Lesson 12 of 18 1 quiz
Lesson summary
16.2.5 Predicting Inheritance: Chi-squared Test — CAMBRIDGE AS & A LEVEL BIOLOGY 9700 — REVISION NOTES notes: Use the chi-squared test to decide whether observed results differ significantly from expected results.Observed and expected — differences may be significant or due to ch…
- Significant difference
- Comparison
- Dependence
- Probability level
- Degrees of freedom
- Greater than or equal to the critical value
Section 1 of 8Purpose of the test
Observed and expected
- Observed and expected differences may be significant or due to chance.
Significant difference
- Significant difference suggests something else is happening, such as linkage between genes.
Test
- Test the chi-squared test finds whether the difference between observed and expected results is significant.
Data
- Data used with categorical data, which can be grouped.
Section 2 of 8Calculating chi-squared
1
Obtain the expected (E) and observed (O) results.
2
Calculate the difference O − E for each class.
3
Square each difference, so the sign does not matter.
4
Divide each squared difference by the expected value.
5
Add the values to give the chi-squared value.
Section 3 of 8Critical value
Comparison
- Comparison compare the chi-squared value with a critical value from a table.
Dependence
- Dependence the critical value depends on the probability level and the degrees of freedom.
Probability level
- Probability level biologists use 0.05 (5 %).
Degrees of freedom
- Degrees of freedom number of classes − 1.
| Degrees of freedom | p = 0.1 | p = 0.05 | p = 0.01 | p = 0.001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 6.64 | 10.83 |
| 2 | 4.60 | 5.99 | 9.21 | 13.82 |
| 3 | 6.25 | 7.82 | 11.34 | 16.27 |
| 4 | 7.78 | 9.49 | 13.28 | 18.46 |
Section 4 of 8Drawing conclusions
Greater than or equal to the critical value
- Greater than or equal to the critical value a significant difference;
- a factor other than chance causes it;
- the null hypothesis is rejected.
Smaller than the critical value
- Smaller than the critical value no significant difference;
- differences are due to chance;
- the null hypothesis is accepted.
Between two probability levels
- Between two probability levels the probability of chance lies between those levels.
Above the 0.001 value
- Above the 0.001 value less than 0.1 % probability that chance explains the difference.
Section 5 of 8Using results
1Reasons for a significant result
- Reasons for a significant result linkage between genes, epistasis or other factors.
2Table
- Table setting out O, E, O − E, (O − E)2 and (O − E)2/E helps avoid errors.
Section 6 of 8More from the specification
More from the specification
Autosomal linkage
- Genes on the same chromosome inherited together.
Punnett square
- A grid predicting offspring genotypes.
Genetic diagram
- Layout showing parents, gametes and offspring of a cross.
Allele
- A version of a gene.
Genotype
- The alleles an organism has.
Recessive
- Expressed only when no dominant allele is present.
Dominant
- Expressed when present in the genotype.
Chromosome
- A thread-like structure of DNA carrying genes.
Homozygous
- Having two identical alleles.
Disease
- A condition in which part of the body does not function properly.
Haemophilia
- A sex-linked recessive blood-clotting disorder.
Expected ratio
- Expected ratio a dihybrid cross between two heterozygotes is expected to give phenotypes in a 9 : 3 : 3 : 1 ratio.
Section 7 of 8Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Chi-squared test | Test comparing observed and expected results. |
| Null hypothesis | Statement that there is no significant difference. |
| Degrees of freedom | Number of classes minus one. |
| Critical value | Value from the table at a chosen probability. |
| Observed value | Result actually counted. |
| Expected value | Result predicted by theory. |
| Categorical data | Data that fit into groups. |
Section 8 of 8Exam technique
1
Using degrees of freedom equal to the number of classes — it is classes − 1.
2
Saying a high chi-squared supports the null hypothesis — it leads to rejecting it.
3
Using percentages instead of counts — use actual numbers.
4
Leaving out the null hypothesis — it must be stated.
Marked practiceQuizzes for this lesson
Last updated: