Skip to content
Dabour HubLEARN · PRACTICE · EXPLORESign inStudent

1.1.1Development of Practical Skills in Physics

Experimental Design

5 min read 9 parts Lesson 2 of 29 1 quiz

0%read
Lesson summary

1.1.1 Experimental Design — OCR A Level Physics A notes: Plan a physics investigation by choosing a testable question, identifying variables, selecting a method and judging whether it will give valid, reliable data.Every practical investigation begins with a question or hypothesi…

  • Independent variable
  • Control variables
  • Worked example 1
  • Worked example 2
  • Dependent variable: the quantity you measure in response (for example its resistance)
  • Calling a quantity 'constant' without saying how it is kept constant; the plan must state the method of control

Section 1 of 9Starting from a testable question

Every practical investigation begins with a question or hypothesis that can be answered by measurement. 'Does a heavier trolley roll faster?' is too vague; 'How does the final speed of a trolley released from rest on a 10° slope depend on the distance it has travelled?' names quantities that can be measured. A good hypothesis predicts a relationship, ideally with a reason from theory, for example that v2 will be directly proportional to distance because the work done by gravity is proportional to distance.

OCR expects you to plan an experiment from first principles, so you should be able to turn a question into a method that someone else could follow and repeat.

Section 2 of 9Identifying the variables

Three kinds of variable must be named in any plan:

Independent variable
Independent variable the quantity you deliberately change (for example the length of a wire).
Dependent variable
Dependent variable the quantity you measure in response (for example its resistance).
Control variables
Control variables everything else that could affect the result and must be kept constant (temperature, cross-sectional area, material, current).

You should state how each will be measured, with which instrument and to what resolution, and state the range and number of values of the independent variable. At least five different values over as wide a range as is practical is the usual minimum for a graph-based experiment, and the range should be chosen so that any pattern, including a possible curve, will be visible.

Section 3 of 9Writing the method

A strong method is a numbered sequence that includes: a labelled diagram or description of the apparatus; what is changed and how; what is measured and with what; how the control variables are held constant; how many repeats are taken; and how the data will be processed. Because the reader must be able to repeat it, specific detail matters: 'measure the diameter with a micrometer at three places along the wire and take the mean' is better than 'measure the wire'.

The processing plan should say which graph is to be drawn and what its gradient or intercept will give. If the theory is R = ρL/A, then plotting R against L gives a straight line through the origin of gradient ρ/A, so ρ = gradient × A.

Section 4 of 9Validity, reliability and safety

A result is valid if the experiment really measures what it claims to measure and the controls are adequate. It is reliable (repeatable) if similar results are obtained when the experiment is repeated. Repeating readings and averaging reduces the effect of random error, but it cannot remove a systematic error such as a zero error or a badly calibrated instrument.

A plan should also include a risk assessment: identify a real hazard, say why it is dangerous and give a sensible precaution. Examples are hot wires (let the wire cool, switch off between readings), falling masses (sand tray, stand clear), lasers (never look along the beam, avoid reflective surfaces) and radioactive sources (tongs, store in a lead-lined box, short handling time).

Section 5 of 9Trial runs and pilot experiments

A preliminary trial is a quick run used to decide sensible ranges, check that the apparatus works and estimate the size of uncertainties.

Trial runs and pilot experiments
A trial may show that a time interval is too short to measure with a stopwatch, which would lead you to choose a longer drop height or light gates instead.
Trial results are normally not included in the final analysis.

This sub-topic links to 1.1.2 (control variables), 1.1.3 (refining a design) and 1.2 (handling data), since the way you will analyse data should be decided at the design stage.

Section 6 of 9Worked planning checklist

When you are asked to design an experiment in an exam, a reliable way to organise the answer is: (1) state the aim and the relationship to be tested; (2) list the variables and how each is measured or controlled; (3) describe the apparatus with a clear diagram; (4) give the steps, including number of repeats; (5) say how results will be analysed and what graph will be plotted; (6) mention safety.

Worked planning checklist
Marks are given for each of these ideas, so a short, ordered answer is better than a long narrative.
Include sensible numerical detail, such as a range of lengths from 0.20 m to 1.00 m in steps of 0.20 m, because it shows you have thought about what is realistic.

Section 7 of 9Worked examples

  1. A student wants to find how the period T of a simple pendulum depends on its length L. Identify the independent, dependent and two control variables, and say what graph would test T2 ∝ L.

  2. For the pendulum graph above, the gradient is 4.02 s2 m−1. Calculate g.

Section 8 of 9Key terms

TermMeaning
Independent variableThe quantity deliberately changed by the experimenter.
Dependent variableThe quantity measured as a response to the change.
Control variableA quantity kept constant so that it does not affect the result.
ValidAn experiment is valid if it measures what it claims to and controls are adequate.
ReliableRepeating the experiment gives consistent results.
Trial runA preliminary experiment to choose ranges and test the apparatus.

Section 9 of 9Exam technique

1
Calling a quantity 'constant' without saying how it is kept constant; the plan must state the method of control.
2
Planning only two or three values of the independent variable, which cannot show whether a relationship is linear.
3
Believing that repeating readings removes systematic error; it only reduces random scatter.
4
Writing a method with no processing step, so that it is unclear how the final quantity will be obtained from the data.
5
Giving a vague safety comment such as 'be careful' instead of a specific hazard and precaution.
\n