Skip to content
Dabour HubLEARN · PRACTICE · EXPLORESign inStudent

BIOLOGY · Stage 8 · Chapter 7: The Health of the Environment

Biology 7.4 Pesticides and bioaccumulation — Persistent Toxins in Food Chains — Alhussan International Academy - Biology (Stages 7-9) Revision Notes & Topical Questions

5 min read 6 parts Lesson 4 of 8

🩺
100% Curriculum Specification Match Lesson Doctor Verified
The only platform with 100% curriculum specification match and verified interactive question banks.
0%read
Lesson summary

7.4 Pesticides and bioaccumulation — Persistent Toxins in Food Chains — Alhussan International Academy — Biology (Stages 7–9) notes: Explain how persistent pesticides build up along food chains by bioaccumulation and harm top predators.Pests — insects, birds, molluscs, mammals, f…

  • Harm to other organisms
  • Biodegradable pesticides
  • Along a food chain
  • Land chain
  • River chain
  • Effect on bird eggs

Section 1 of 6Why pesticides are used

  • Pests
    • insects, birds, molluscs, mammals, fungi and weeds feed on crops, and around 30% of the food grown is lost to pests.
  • Pesticides = substances that kill pests of all types, used by farmers and gardeners for many years.
    • They can increase crop yield and so help produce enough food.
  • Harm to other organisms
    • pesticides can kill bees, which are needed for pollination, and fish in streams after chemicals wash off the fields.

Section 2 of 6Pesticides as toxins

  • Toxins
    • pesticides are poisons, so every use puts toxins into the environment.
  • Biodegradable pesticides
    • many break down quickly.
  • Persistent pesticides
    • some, such as the insecticide DDT, do not break down and stay in the environment.
    • Many dissolve in fat rather than water, so animals cannot easily excrete them.
    • They are stored in fatty tissue, and each time the animal feeds more is added.

Section 3 of 6Bioaccumulation

  • Bioaccumulation = the increase in concentration of a substance in an organism over time.
    • Persistent pesticides build up because organisms eat contaminated food.
  • Along a food chain
    • biomass passes along the chain, so toxins become more concentrated at each stage.
    • Each predator eats many prey, so it takes in the toxin from all of them.
    • Top predators therefore receive the highest doses, even if the concentration in the environment was very low.
  • Evidence
    • scientists found many dead predators, including sparrowhawks and herons, with high pesticide levels in their bodies.

Section 4 of 6Examples of food chains

1Land chain2 points
  • insects and small mammals eat seeds and plants sprayed with pesticide.
  • A top predator such as a sparrowhawk eats many of them and takes in enough pesticide to kill it.
2River chain3 points
  • pesticides wash into rivers and small fish absorb tiny amounts and store them.
  • Bigger fish absorb the toxins from the small fish.
  • At the end of the chain a heron eats enough toxic fish and frogs to die.
3Sea chain2 points
  • pesticides carried down rivers are absorbed by small fish, which are eaten by bigger fish and then by seals.
  • One seal eats a lot of fish, so levels build up, and a polar bear that eats many seals can receive a lethal dose.

Section 5 of 6Effects on the ecosystem

  • Effect on bird eggs
    • DDT caused thin eggshells in birds of prey, which broke, so their numbers fell sharply.
  • Interdependence
    • the death of top predators affects other species.
    • Prey numbers may build up and put stress on other food sources.
    • Numbers of a different predator may increase.

Section 6 of 6Reducing the harm

  • Ban or restrict persistent pesticides, as with DDT in many countries.
  • Use biodegradable chemicals that break down quickly.
  • Use biological control, where a natural predator or parasite of the pest is introduced.
  • Use integrated pest management, with crop rotation and resistant crop varieties, so fewer chemicals are needed.
  • Trade-off
    • DDT also saved millions of lives by killing malaria mosquitoes, so benefits must be weighed against environmental costs.

Last updated: