Tools and Inquiry — IB Physics skills
I.2.3 Interpreting results in Physics — IB Physics HL Revision Notes & Topical Questions
5 min read 9 parts Lesson 20 of 22 1 quiz
Lesson summary
I.2.3 Interpreting results in Physics — IB PHYSICS SL notes: Interpret data and graphs, explain trends and anomalies, and assess accuracy, precision, reliability and validity.This is the "sense-making" phase — analysing processed data for patterns, trends and relationships.The go…
- y-intercept
- Area under the curve
- Error bars
- Link the graph to theory
- Use the gradient to find the physical quantity
- Highlight it on the graph
Part 1 of 7Aim of interpretation
1This is the "sense-making" phase
- This is the "sense-making" phase analysing processed data for patterns, trends and relationships.
2
The goal is to decide what the results say, to answer the research question.
3
It almost always involves a graph of the independent against the dependent variable.
Part 2 of 7Qualitative and quantitative data together
Qualitative and quantitative data together
Qualitative observations are evidence that explains quantitative results.
A resistivity higher than the accepted value may be explained by a wire that felt warm.
- Current heated the wire, raising its resistance and the calculated resistivity.
Part 3 of 7Features of a graph
Features of a graph
Gradient
- Gradient can represent a key physical quantity.
- For I against V of an ohmic resistor the gradient is 1/R.
y-intercept
- y-intercept the value of the dependent variable when the independent variable is zero.
- It can reveal systematic errors, such as a zero error.
Area under the curve
- Area under the curve a total quantity.
- The area under a velocity–time graph is displacement; under force–distance it is work done.
Error bars
- Error bars show the precision of the data.
- Large bars suggest significant random error.
- A line passing through all error bars indicates a good fit.
Part 4 of 7Describing and explaining trends
Describing and explaining trends
Two steps.
- Describe the trend using terms such as directly proportional, linear positive correlation, inversely proportional or exponential increase.
- Explain the trend with physical principles and equations — this is the most important part.
Link the graph to theory
- T2 against L is a straight line through the origin because T2 = (4π2/g)L.
Use the gradient to find the physical quantity
- Use the gradient to find the physical quantity e.g. g = 4π2/gradient — and compare it with the accepted value.
Part 5 of 7Anomalous results
1
An anomalous result clearly does not fit the overall trend.
2Highlight it on the graph
- Highlight it on the graph never delete data without comment.
3
Justify it using physics, not "it looks odd".
- Link it to a likely experimental error, e.g. a delay in starting the stopwatch.
4
Exclude it from the average and the graph after justifying.
Part 6 of 7Accuracy, precision, reliability and validity
| Term | Meaning | Affected by |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | How close the final result is to the accepted value | Systematic errors |
| Precision | How close repeat measurements are to each other | Random errors |
| Reliability | Consistency of results when repeated | Repeats and consistent method |
| Validity | Fair test with relevant, controlled variables | Control of other variables |
Comment on accuracy only when a literature value is available.
A small spread in the data shows high precision.
Repeating and averaging improves accuracy and shows anomalies.
Reliability question
- Reliability question would similar conclusions be reached if someone repeated the experiment?
Validity question
- Validity question how relevant is the experiment to the original research question?
- Charles' law needs pressure to be kept constant.
Part 7 of 7More from the specification
More from the specification
Simple pendulum period and length
- Simple pendulum period and length the period squared of a simple pendulum is directly proportional to its string length T2 ∝ L.
Percentage uncertainty calculation
- Percentage uncertainty calculation calculated by dividing absolute measurement uncertainty by the recorded value and multiplying by one hundred percent.
Repeated measurement trials
- Repeated measurement trials conducting multiple experimental trials reduces random errors, yielding a more reliable mean result to record in data tables.
Timing Oscillations in Pendulum Experiments
- Measuring the time for multiple complete swings in each trial reduces the percentage uncertainty in the period T.
- (e.g. 10 or 20 oscillations)
Propagating Uncertainties in Physics Equations
- When squaring or taking square roots of experimental variables, the fractional uncertainty is scaled by the power.
- (such as length L in pendulum formulas)
Error Bars and Worst-Fit Gradients
- Experimental data plotted on Cartesian axes with error bars allow construction of maximum and minimum lines of best fit to determine gradient uncertainty.
Raw Data Recording Standards
- Raw measurements must be recorded to the resolution of the measuring instrument, with consistent decimal places and explicit uncertainty statements.
Simple pendulum
- A small bob on a light string of length L
Repeat trial
- Repetition of a measurement to improve reliability.
Uncertainty
- An estimate of the range in which the true value is expected to lie.
Length
- Resistance is directly proportional to the length of a wire.
Pendulum
- A weight swinging on a string, exchanging GPE and KE.
Period
- Time for one revolution.
Decimal place
- A digit to the right of the decimal point.
Potential difference
- Work done by a unit charge passing through a component.
Significant figures
- Digits carrying meaningful information in a number.
Percentage uncertainty
- The absolute uncertainty divided by the value, times 100%.
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Gradient | Change in y divided by change in x; often a physical quantity. |
| y-intercept | Value of y at x = 0; can reveal systematic error. |
| Accuracy | Closeness of a result to the accepted value. |
| Precision | Closeness of repeated measurements to each other. |
| Reliability | Consistency of results when repeated. |
| Validity | Whether the experiment is a fair test of the research question. |
Avoid these mistakes
1
Describing a trend without explaining it with physics.
2
Confusing accuracy (closeness to the true value) with precision (closeness of repeats).
3
Commenting on accuracy when there is no accepted value to compare.
4
Deleting anomalous points without comment.
5
Ignoring a non-zero y-intercept that points to a systematic error.
Marked practiceQuizzes for this lesson
Last updated:
\n