Skip to content
Dabour HubLEARN · PRACTICE · EXPLORESign inStudent

Tools and Inquiry — IB Physics skills

I.2.1 Collecting data in Physics — IB Physics HL Revision Notes & Topical Questions

5 min read 8 parts Lesson 18 of 22 1 quiz

📚 IB Physics HL Hub / Topical Revision
🩺
100% Curriculum Specification Match Lesson Doctor Verified
The only platform with 100% curriculum specification match and verified interactive question banks.
0%read
Lesson summary

I.2.1 Collecting data in Physics — IB PHYSICS SL notes: Collect sufficient quantitative and qualitative data, record it correctly and respond to problems during data collection.This is the "doing" phase — performing the experiment that was designed.The goal is high-quality raw da…

  • It involves precise measurements and recording all relevant information
  • Quantitative data
  • The raw data table is the foundation of the report
  • At least three repeat trials for each increment
  • Record raw readings directly
  • Observations are evidence

Part 1 of 6Aim of data collection

1This is the "doing" phase
  • This is the "doing" phase performing the experiment that was designed.
2
The goal is high-quality raw data that is accurate and sufficient to answer the research question.
3It involves precise measurements and recording all relevant information
  • It involves precise measurements and recording all relevant information numbers and observations.

Part 2 of 6Raw data table

1Quantitative data
Quantitative data numerical data that you measure.
2The raw data table is the foundation of the report
  • The raw data table is the foundation of the report it is the first table and holds only direct measurements, with no calculations.
3
Design the table before starting.
  • A specific title describing the experiment.
  • Clearly labelled columns for the independent and dependent variables.
  • Units and uncertainties in the column headers, not in the body of the table.
4
Record to the precision of the instrument.
  • A metre rule marked in millimetres gives readings such as 0.550 m (three decimal places).
  • A digital multimeter reading to two decimals gives 5.00 V, not 5 V.

Part 3 of 6Sufficient data

1
Enough data points to see a trend.
2
At least five increments of the independent variable.
3At least three repeat trials for each increment
  • At least three repeat trials for each increment to ensure reliability.
4Record raw readings directly
  • Record raw readings directly never do calculations in your head or on scrap paper.

Part 4 of 6Qualitative observations

1Qualitative data
Qualitative data non-numerical data observed during the experiment.
2
It gives context and helps explain unexpected results or errors.
3
Examples in physics.
  • A pendulum swinging in a slight ellipse instead of a plane.
  • A flicker on a digital multimeter showing an unstable reading.
  • A wire or component warm to the touch, showing heat dissipated in a resistance.
  • A laser beam spreading as it passes through a narrow slit.
4Observations are evidence
  • Observations are evidence they can be used in the conclusion and evaluation.

Part 5 of 6Dealing with issues during collection

Dealing with issues during collection
Notice and respond to problems as they happen
  • Notice and respond to problems as they happen do not ignore them, and record them in the lab notes.
Unstable readings.
  • Wait for the reading to settle, or record the central value and estimate the fluctuation as an uncertainty.
  • Record how it was handled.
Anomalous result (outlier).
  • Record it, then do an additional trial to get a reliable set.
  • Do not erase it — its exclusion is justified later.
Difficulty in measuring (e.g. an oscillating spring).
  • Make a note — it is a limitation of the method to discuss in the evaluation.
Poor contacts
  • Poor contacts clean and re-attach connections to get stable readings.

Part 6 of 6More from the specification

1
Period Measurement and Averaging
  • Measuring the time for multiple complete oscillations of a simple pendulum of fixed length and dividing by the cycle count yields an accurate average period with minimal reaction error.
2
Data Processing and Significant Figures
  • Recorded experimental data must be tabulated systematically and processed to significant figures consistent with the instrument's measurement uncertainty.
3
Linearizing Graph Relationships
  • Plotting period squared (T2 against pendulum length (L) produces a straight-line graph, confirming the theoretical power relationship and allowing gravitational acceleration g to be evaluated from the slope.
4
Graph Plotting Conventions
  • Data points and uncertainty error bars are plotted with the independent variable on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis to construct lines of best fit.
5
Simple pendulum
  • A small bob on a light string of length L
6
Random error
  • An unpredictable variation in readings, reduced by repeating and averaging.
7
Length
  • Resistance is directly proportional to the length of a wire.
8
Period
  • Time for one revolution.
9
Current
  • Flow of electrons in a circuit.
10
Gradient
  • Slope of a graph line.
11
Potential difference
  • Work done by a unit charge passing through a component.
12
Significant figures
  • Digits carrying meaningful information in a number.
13
Percentage uncertainty
  • The absolute uncertainty divided by the value, times 100%.
14
Absolute uncertainty
  • The range ±Δx in the same unit as the measurement.

Key terms

TermMeaning
Raw dataDirect measurements recorded without calculation.
Quantitative dataNumerical data that is measured.
Qualitative dataNon-numerical observations.
Anomalous resultResult that does not fit the pattern of the others.
Repeat trialRepetition of a measurement to improve reliability.
ResolutionSmallest change an instrument can show.

Avoid these mistakes

1
Putting calculations in the raw data table.
2
Writing units after every number instead of in the column headers.
3
Recording readings with fewer decimal places than the instrument allows.
4
Deleting an outlier instead of recording it and repeating the trial.
5
Ignoring qualitative observations that explain unexpected results.

Last updated:

\n