Skip to content
Dabour HubLEARN · PRACTICE · EXPLORESign inStudent

4.7.5Additional lessons

Pedigree Charts — IB Biology SL Revision Notes & Topical Questions

5 min read 6 parts Lesson 127 of 142

📚 IB Biology SL Hub / Topical Revision
🩺
100% Curriculum Specification Match Lesson Doctor Verified
The only platform with 100% curriculum specification match and verified interactive question banks.
0%read

Part 1 of 6Reading a Pedigree

A pedigree traces a characteristic through a family so that you can infer its inheritance pattern.

Symbols
  • Symbols Squares represent males and circles represent females;
    • a shaded symbol means the person has the condition.
Lines
  • Lines A horizontal line joins two parents, and a vertical line links them to their children, who are shown in a row beneath.
Generations
  • Generations Generations are labelled with Roman numerals, and individuals within a generation are numbered from left to right.
Carriers
  • Carriers Unshaded individuals may carry a recessive allele, which can only be deduced from their parents or children.

Part 2 of 6Clues for the Pattern

Clues for the Pattern
Recessive
  • Recessive Two unaffected parents having an affected child proves that the condition is recessive and both parents are carriers.
Dominant
  • Dominant Every affected person has an affected parent, and two affected parents may have an unaffected child.
Autosomal
  • Autosomal Males and females are affected in similar numbers, and an affected father with an unaffected daughter rules out X-linked dominance.
X-linked recessive
  • X-linked recessive Many more males are affected;
    • the trait passes through carrier females, and an affected daughter needs an affected father.

Part 3 of 6Method for Answering

1
Look for unaffected parents with an affected child, which is the strongest clue that the allele is recessive.
2
Choose letters for the alleles and write the genotypes you can be certain of, starting with the affected individuals.
3
Test whether the pattern could be sex-linked by checking whether an affected daughter has an unaffected father.
4
Work out genotypes of the others from the parent and child genotypes, using the words must be or could be.
5
Calculate probabilities by using a Punnett grid for the relevant parents.

Part 4 of 6Related Ideas

Consanguinity
  • Consanguinity Matings between close relatives are riskier because relatives are more likely to share the same recessive alleles.
Inductive reasoning
  • Inductive reasoning General rules are drawn from many specific observations, such as repeated patterns across families.
Deductive reasoning
  • Deductive reasoning A known rule is used to deduce a specific conclusion, such as the genotypes of two unaffected parents with an affected child.

Part 5 of 6Worked Example

Question

  • Two unaffected parents have a daughter with albinism, a condition caused by the absence of melanin.
  • State the inheritance of the condition, the parents' genotypes, and the probability that their next child is affected.

  1. Unaffected parents with an affected child means the allele must be recessive.
  2. An affected daughter has an unaffected father, which rules out X-linked recessive inheritance, so it is autosomal.
  3. Use A and athe daughter is aa and each parent must be Aa.
  4. Aa × Aa gives AA, Aa, aA, aa, so one in four children is aa.

Answer

  • Autosomal recessive;
    • both parents are Aa;
    • the chance of the next child being affected is 25%.

Part 6 of 6Exam Checklist & Tips

4.7.5 – Key Points for the Exam

  • Pedigree chart A diagram showing inheritance of a trait across generations of a family.
  • Affected Showing the phenotype of the condition being studied.
  • Carrier An unaffected person with one copy of a recessive allele.
  • Consanguinity Reproduction between closely related individuals.
  • Inductive reasoning Forming a general conclusion from specific observations.

Common Mistakes

  • Calling every unaffected individual homozygous dominant; some are carriers.
  • Concluding a condition is sex-linked just because it is seen in males; check an affected daughter.
  • Mixing up the symbols for male and female or forgetting what shading means.
  • Giving a definite genotype when the chart only allows a possibility.

Last updated:

\n